© 2018 by Robert Person.  The views expressed on this website are my own and do not represent the official policy of the U.S. Army, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.

kirby.einck
May 9, 2019

Statement from President Donald J. Trump Regarding Imposing Sanctions with Respect to the Iron, Steel, Aluminum, and Copper Sectors of Iran

 

As of May 8, 2019, President Trump signed an executive order to emplace sanctions on Iran’s oil, steel, aluminum and copper sections. These resources account for the largest non-petroleum-related sources of export revenue for the Iranian economy. These resources account for nearly 10% of its export economy. The United States has also alerted other nations that the importation of these materials into their ports will no longer be acceptable. Under the Iran Nuclear Deal, the nation was given the freedom to sponsor terrorist networks, instigate regional conflicts, detain U.S. citizens and most importantly, develop its missile forces and nuclear weapons archive all while brutalizing its own people in the process. Having already ceased American participation in this deal, President Trump has imposed these sanctions in the hope that they will increase pressures on Iran to stop participating in such activities. So far, it has proven successful by cutting the funds available to Iran to continue its sponsorship of violent terrorism and sending the Iranian economy into a depression. Through these actions and future sanctions, the United States will be able to strengthen its national security. As it stands now for Iran, the only way in which to save its economy is to alter its conduct and adhere to the proposed U.S. agreement.

These imposed sanctions prove to be a representation of an effective way to use economic pressure in achieving an end goal. Through these coercive economic sanctions, the United States can force a foreign government to do something they don’t want to do. In this case, the United States is forcing Iran to stop its funding of terrorist groups and the development of its nuclear weapons arsenal and missile forces. This is also a good example of “smart sanction.” The concept behind these sanctions is the idea that they target the leaders and influencers of the country without harming the civilians. While these sanctions maybe sending the Iranian economy into a depression, they are solely aimed at those who are taking part in these activities. No civilians have been directly harmed in the process. These sanctions have also proven to be successful for the fact that they were used at an appropriate time. When deciding to implement these sanctions, leaders must look at four different criteria. The first is if there is money at stake. For Iran, these materials are crucial in their foreign trade and comprise most of its economy, and therefore makes economic sanctions ideal for the United States. Secondly, will these sanctions apply enough pressure to change the country’s policies? Again, given that these materials are vital to Iran’s economic stability, it is in Iran’s best interests to change its ways. Third, does the United States have the determination to maintain these sanctions? This strategy allows the United States to become involved military and President Trump has shown no signs of backing down. He has even made it clear to other nations that importing these materials is not acceptable. Finally, does the target have a feasible way out of these sanctions? Only the future will tell of Iran’s alternative options but with a diminishing economy, there are not many options available to Iran. It will be interesting to see in the coming months if these sanctions will force Iran into committing to future agreements with the United States.

 

Article can be found at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-president-donald-j-trump-regarding-imposing-sanctions-respect-iron-steel-aluminum-copper-sectors-iran/

0 comments0 replies
New Posts
  • christopher.chaulk
    May 10, 2019

    Sanctions Can't Spark Regime Change

    Discussion 
    In his article for Foreign Affairs David Cohen talks about the Trump administration's policy towards sanctions. He talks about how the conditional sanctions the Trump administrations has placed on Iran and now Venezuela will be ineffective because the changes the administration is trying to coerce will essentially mean regime change for the two nations. Cohen goes on to state that these will be ultimately ineffective because the relative cost of the sanctions is lower than the cost of losing power. This means that the leaders of Iran and Venezuela are more willing to bear the pain of the sanctions than lose the regime. This goes along with the lesson we had on sanctions in a couple of ways. First we learned that sanctions are used either as a method of deterrence or coercion. This means that the sanctions inflict financial and economic pain to make the target of the sanctions take or not take an action. These sanctions are meant to cause political changes that will in essence mean a change of regime which is why they will fail. They are effective in causing pain; however, there is not enough sanctions in the world to make it worth losing power. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2019-04-29/sanctions-cant-spark-regime-change
  • william.moorhead
    May 10, 2019

    Trump Increases China Tariffs as Trade Deal Hangs in the Balance

    Discussion 
    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/us/politics/china-trade-tariffs.html Just before a scheduled round of trade negotiations began on Friday, President Trump announced that he was still going to levy additional tariffs on Chinese imports valued at approximately $250 billion. President Trump claimed that these tariffs would bring billions of dollars back to US manufacturers, but the main focus seems to be inflicting pain on China, as opposed to bringing prosperity to the US. China and the US have not been able to reach an agreement that would minimize or end outright the "trade war" between the two, which stems from the Trump Administration's belief that China is not doing all it can to protect American investments and intellectual property in China, as well as the belief that a large trade deficit with China is inherently bad. The Trump Administration's use of tariffs as a negotiating tool is inelegant, but effective. Unilateral tariffs immediately affect the Chinese export industry, whose products become less competitive in US markets. While this inflicts pain on Chinese exports, whose largest market is the US, it also affects US consumers, who have to pay higher costs for consumer goods. Additionally, because China retaliates with target tariffs (on politically-relevant goods like Kentucky Bourbon and soybeans from the Heartland), US exporters are equally hurt by the trade war. The only immediate winner is the US, who collects revenue from the applied tariffs; however, long-term, US domestic industry should improve, as they will become more competitive when Chinese imports are more expensive. Slowly, we are starting to see this happen: Dan DiMicco, the chairman of a lobby group "Coalition for a Prosperous America," explained that American manufacturing is already experiencing gains in their domestic market shares.
  • christopher.papa
    May 10, 2019

    Illegal Immigration and Migration

    Discussion 
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/may/8/feds-release-168k-illegal-immigrant-family-members/ In Stephen Dinan's article in the Washington Times, he explains the unforeseen immigration due to illegal border crossings. ICE border patrol has released 168,000 illegal immigrant family members this fiscal year, and the number is expected to increase as the border situation increases in volatility (Dinan). Dinan reports that 87% of families in this new pilot program skip their court hearings, and with an ill-equipted government to track them down judges deport them in absentia (Dinan). Dinan argues that this increase in illegal immigration in family units is caused by a 2015 court ruling that stated parents who travel with children must be released in 20 days. Since this is too little time try them in court, the families are set free (Dinan). This article is very relevant to this block in IPE as it highlights a crucial phase that the world is going through. As policies towards free and open borders begin to gain more and more traction, we can expect the number of border crossings into the country to continue. As we talked in class, this may actually be a good thing for the economy, as low skill labor is substituted due to a higher rate of college attenuation and graduation. Dinan says that most migrants interviewed are not criminals, they are just seeking jobs, and know that if they bring children they will find asylum in the US (Dinan). One of the unintended consequences is that some of these migrants are being used to smuggle drugs and weapons into the country, and in some extreme cases, children are being sold to impersonate children of felons migrants of south american countries to gain access with ease. As globalization brings countries closer together and as the trend for free an open borders continues incentivizing cheap labor, it will be interesting to see the effects of these policies 10-15 years in time.