© 2018 by Robert Person.  The views expressed on this website are my own and do not represent the official policy of the U.S. Army, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.

kirby.einck
Feb 11, 2019

Qatar and Exxon Mobil Plan $10 Billion Gas Investment in Texas

Qatar and Exxon Mobile have recently decided to invest more than $10 billion into Golden Pass, a terminal in Texas designed to import gas from the domestic shale fields of Texas and New Mexico. With investments from Qatar and Exxon Mobile, the hope is that Golden Pass will become an export hub for the extracted gas. According to the Chief Executive of Exxon Mobile, Darren Woods, this investment “will provide an increased, reliable, long-term supply of liquefied natural gas to global gas markets, stimulate local growth and create thousands of jobs,” Qatar Petroleum is already the biggest liquefied natural gas exporter in the world, but with this investment, Qatar will be able to push deeper into the United States to allow for quicker access to Latin America freeing more of its domestic production for Asian markets. This investment will also allow Qatar to strengthen its relationship with the Trump administration, which has established close ties with Saudi Arabia. This proves to be important because it has been nearly two years since Saudi Arabia and its allies have placed a trade embargo on Qatar and with this investment, Qatar hopes that they can come into favor with President Trump. Qatar has also left OPEC to focus on its gas business as the dominance of Qatar in long-distance shipping of natural gas, is under threat from America and Australia. It has even been said that natural gas has the fastest growing demand worldwide and the number of countries importing this gas has more than doubled.


This article further explains why free trade is so valuable and why the general public should see trade as a way to achieve higher real income that would otherwise not be attainable. As it stands now, the general public strongly believes in instituting tariffs because it protects their main interests. What is concerning to the public about trade are the employment, income, conditions of workers in developing countries and the fear of losing or other’s losing from free trade. However, what they don’t understand is that free trade can result in more jobs as seen with the investment in Golden Pass. It is estimated that from this investment there will be 9,000 jobs in construction alone not to mention the 200 plus permanent jobs. Qatar wants to establish strong relationships with the United States because they want more free trade that they are no longer receiving from Saudi Arabia. Free trade would allow Qatar to benefit from their abundance of oil and would create a stronger comparative advantage in the rapidly expanding market. Not to mention free trade allows for further specialization and exchange, higher returns to scale from larger markets and the exchange of ideas and technology, all which Qatar is currently missing out on because of the embargo emplaced on them. The United States is their last-ditch effort to maintain their dominance in the long-term supply of natural gas. Finally, this article also spoke to the sector model of trade politics in the sense of losers and winners in this scenario. Although this article does not directly relate, it does in the sense this model predicts that the supposed winner in competition is the one who employs labor and capital in a country’s industry that relies on an abundant resource. Since oil is the abundant resource and considered to be export-oriented, Qatar’s investment in Golden Pass would only increase their likelihood of remaining a dominant force in this field.

Article Found at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/05/business/energy-environment/qatar-exxon-mobil-gas-export.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FInternational%20Trade%20and%20World%20Market&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=3&pgtype=collection

0 comments0 replies
New Posts
  • christopher.chaulk
    May 10, 2019

    Sanctions Can't Spark Regime Change

    Discussion 
    In his article for Foreign Affairs David Cohen talks about the Trump administration's policy towards sanctions. He talks about how the conditional sanctions the Trump administrations has placed on Iran and now Venezuela will be ineffective because the changes the administration is trying to coerce will essentially mean regime change for the two nations. Cohen goes on to state that these will be ultimately ineffective because the relative cost of the sanctions is lower than the cost of losing power. This means that the leaders of Iran and Venezuela are more willing to bear the pain of the sanctions than lose the regime. This goes along with the lesson we had on sanctions in a couple of ways. First we learned that sanctions are used either as a method of deterrence or coercion. This means that the sanctions inflict financial and economic pain to make the target of the sanctions take or not take an action. These sanctions are meant to cause political changes that will in essence mean a change of regime which is why they will fail. They are effective in causing pain; however, there is not enough sanctions in the world to make it worth losing power. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2019-04-29/sanctions-cant-spark-regime-change
  • william.moorhead
    May 10, 2019

    Trump Increases China Tariffs as Trade Deal Hangs in the Balance

    Discussion 
    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/us/politics/china-trade-tariffs.html Just before a scheduled round of trade negotiations began on Friday, President Trump announced that he was still going to levy additional tariffs on Chinese imports valued at approximately $250 billion. President Trump claimed that these tariffs would bring billions of dollars back to US manufacturers, but the main focus seems to be inflicting pain on China, as opposed to bringing prosperity to the US. China and the US have not been able to reach an agreement that would minimize or end outright the "trade war" between the two, which stems from the Trump Administration's belief that China is not doing all it can to protect American investments and intellectual property in China, as well as the belief that a large trade deficit with China is inherently bad. The Trump Administration's use of tariffs as a negotiating tool is inelegant, but effective. Unilateral tariffs immediately affect the Chinese export industry, whose products become less competitive in US markets. While this inflicts pain on Chinese exports, whose largest market is the US, it also affects US consumers, who have to pay higher costs for consumer goods. Additionally, because China retaliates with target tariffs (on politically-relevant goods like Kentucky Bourbon and soybeans from the Heartland), US exporters are equally hurt by the trade war. The only immediate winner is the US, who collects revenue from the applied tariffs; however, long-term, US domestic industry should improve, as they will become more competitive when Chinese imports are more expensive. Slowly, we are starting to see this happen: Dan DiMicco, the chairman of a lobby group "Coalition for a Prosperous America," explained that American manufacturing is already experiencing gains in their domestic market shares.
  • christopher.papa
    May 10, 2019

    Illegal Immigration and Migration

    Discussion 
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/may/8/feds-release-168k-illegal-immigrant-family-members/ In Stephen Dinan's article in the Washington Times, he explains the unforeseen immigration due to illegal border crossings. ICE border patrol has released 168,000 illegal immigrant family members this fiscal year, and the number is expected to increase as the border situation increases in volatility (Dinan). Dinan reports that 87% of families in this new pilot program skip their court hearings, and with an ill-equipted government to track them down judges deport them in absentia (Dinan). Dinan argues that this increase in illegal immigration in family units is caused by a 2015 court ruling that stated parents who travel with children must be released in 20 days. Since this is too little time try them in court, the families are set free (Dinan). This article is very relevant to this block in IPE as it highlights a crucial phase that the world is going through. As policies towards free and open borders begin to gain more and more traction, we can expect the number of border crossings into the country to continue. As we talked in class, this may actually be a good thing for the economy, as low skill labor is substituted due to a higher rate of college attenuation and graduation. Dinan says that most migrants interviewed are not criminals, they are just seeking jobs, and know that if they bring children they will find asylum in the US (Dinan). One of the unintended consequences is that some of these migrants are being used to smuggle drugs and weapons into the country, and in some extreme cases, children are being sold to impersonate children of felons migrants of south american countries to gain access with ease. As globalization brings countries closer together and as the trend for free an open borders continues incentivizing cheap labor, it will be interesting to see the effects of these policies 10-15 years in time.