© 2018 by Robert Person.  The views expressed on this website are my own and do not represent the official policy of the U.S. Army, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government.

Apr 16

How China’s Central Bank Plans to Support Economic Growth



On Monday, the People’s Bank of China’s (the PBOC) declared that China would pursue a stable monetary policy to better coordinate with their fiscal policy and other policies in order to sustain stable economic growth. The PBOC, in a statement made following a quarterly meeting, did not declare what specific structural adjustments have been enacted, but it did discuss its goals to maintain a prudent monetary policy and allow for higher liquidity in the interbank market. In the article, an ING economist, Iris Pang, stated that she expected tax cuts and extra spending on infrastructure to reach 4 trillion yuan or $596.45 billion by the end of 2019 (Reuters). This potential stimulus will most likely help revive the Chinese economy following its slow start earlier this year. Furthermore, the PBOC lowered banks’ reserve requirement ratio five separate times in the past year and is expected to continue easing its monetary policy in order to encourage further lending and reduce borrowing costs for small and private businesses. An upcoming benchmark for Beijing and the success of its latest policies is the first-quarter economic growth pace, which will be reported on Wednesday (Reuters).


This article applies to this block because the PBOC continues to adjust its fiscal and monetary policy in order to jump start economic growth in the country, but not with much success. For example, the PBOC lowered the reserve requirement ratio to promote more lending to small and private businesses. What lowering the reserve requirement means is that banks may keep less money in their savings, which will hopefully encourage people to take more loans and decrease the amount of money in the bank. Furthermore, they are expected to reduce borrowing costs, which means that they will most likely lower interest rates on loans. Lowering interest rates means that private businesses are more likely to take out loans to invest because it will not cost as much to pay the loans back, and therefore the money they invest from loans will result in economic output. However, as we discussed in class, the U.S. housing bubble in 2008 burst because people were borrowing money with extremely low interest rates from the bank and then they could not pay it back. Additionally, Beijing is cutting taxes in order to influence fiscal policy, which directly affects aggregate demand for goods and services. When governments cut taxes without reducing expenditures, aggregate demand for goods and services rises because consumers increase expenditures by some proportion of the tax reduction. This increase in expenditures might potentially increase the money supply, which would cause domestic interest rates to fall. This would result in a change in monetary policy, which affects the aggregate demand for goods and services indirectly. This expansionary monetary policy explains why the Chinese will lower interest rates; by increasing aggregate demand, output and employment will hopefully rise. A factor that might further affect monetary and fiscal policy is the current trade disputes between the United States and China, however how remains to be seen. By increasing domestic investment into the economy, China could potentially decrease the affects of international trade disputes.


This article may be found at: "China's central bank call for more policy coordination to support growth," Reuters, https://in.reuters.com/article/china-economy/china-central-bank-calls-for-more-policy-coordination-to-support-growth-idINKCN1RR0XG

New Posts
  • In his article for Foreign Affairs David Cohen talks about the Trump administration's policy towards sanctions. He talks about how the conditional sanctions the Trump administrations has placed on Iran and now Venezuela will be ineffective because the changes the administration is trying to coerce will essentially mean regime change for the two nations. Cohen goes on to state that these will be ultimately ineffective because the relative cost of the sanctions is lower than the cost of losing power. This means that the leaders of Iran and Venezuela are more willing to bear the pain of the sanctions than lose the regime. This goes along with the lesson we had on sanctions in a couple of ways. First we learned that sanctions are used either as a method of deterrence or coercion. This means that the sanctions inflict financial and economic pain to make the target of the sanctions take or not take an action. These sanctions are meant to cause political changes that will in essence mean a change of regime which is why they will fail. They are effective in causing pain; however, there is not enough sanctions in the world to make it worth losing power. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2019-04-29/sanctions-cant-spark-regime-change
  • https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/us/politics/china-trade-tariffs.html Just before a scheduled round of trade negotiations began on Friday, President Trump announced that he was still going to levy additional tariffs on Chinese imports valued at approximately $250 billion. President Trump claimed that these tariffs would bring billions of dollars back to US manufacturers, but the main focus seems to be inflicting pain on China, as opposed to bringing prosperity to the US. China and the US have not been able to reach an agreement that would minimize or end outright the "trade war" between the two, which stems from the Trump Administration's belief that China is not doing all it can to protect American investments and intellectual property in China, as well as the belief that a large trade deficit with China is inherently bad. The Trump Administration's use of tariffs as a negotiating tool is inelegant, but effective. Unilateral tariffs immediately affect the Chinese export industry, whose products become less competitive in US markets. While this inflicts pain on Chinese exports, whose largest market is the US, it also affects US consumers, who have to pay higher costs for consumer goods. Additionally, because China retaliates with target tariffs (on politically-relevant goods like Kentucky Bourbon and soybeans from the Heartland), US exporters are equally hurt by the trade war. The only immediate winner is the US, who collects revenue from the applied tariffs; however, long-term, US domestic industry should improve, as they will become more competitive when Chinese imports are more expensive. Slowly, we are starting to see this happen: Dan DiMicco, the chairman of a lobby group "Coalition for a Prosperous America," explained that American manufacturing is already experiencing gains in their domestic market shares.
  • https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/may/8/feds-release-168k-illegal-immigrant-family-members/ In Stephen Dinan's article in the Washington Times, he explains the unforeseen immigration due to illegal border crossings. ICE border patrol has released 168,000 illegal immigrant family members this fiscal year, and the number is expected to increase as the border situation increases in volatility (Dinan). Dinan reports that 87% of families in this new pilot program skip their court hearings, and with an ill-equipted government to track them down judges deport them in absentia (Dinan). Dinan argues that this increase in illegal immigration in family units is caused by a 2015 court ruling that stated parents who travel with children must be released in 20 days. Since this is too little time try them in court, the families are set free (Dinan). This article is very relevant to this block in IPE as it highlights a crucial phase that the world is going through. As policies towards free and open borders begin to gain more and more traction, we can expect the number of border crossings into the country to continue. As we talked in class, this may actually be a good thing for the economy, as low skill labor is substituted due to a higher rate of college attenuation and graduation. Dinan says that most migrants interviewed are not criminals, they are just seeking jobs, and know that if they bring children they will find asylum in the US (Dinan). One of the unintended consequences is that some of these migrants are being used to smuggle drugs and weapons into the country, and in some extreme cases, children are being sold to impersonate children of felons migrants of south american countries to gain access with ease. As globalization brings countries closer together and as the trend for free an open borders continues incentivizing cheap labor, it will be interesting to see the effects of these policies 10-15 years in time.